Simply when it appeared like Qualcomm was overtaking Intel with its newest X-Elite processors, Intel was again with its best and aggressive processors. The corporate has lately introduced its newest Lunar Lake processors, designed to be highly effective and battery-efficient. Within the launch keynote, Intel had large numbers on paper. Intel claims these can beat each the Apple M-series and Qualcomm X-Elite when it comes to efficiency and effectivity. Laptops powered by the most recent Intel Lunar Lake processors are already obtainable for buy; it’s time to examine Intel and Qualcomm and determine who owns the crown.
What are Intel Lunar Lake Processors?
Intel Lunar Lake is the most recent processor from Intel and is designed for skinny and ultra-thin laptops. Intel claims these are essentially the most environment friendly processes it has ever made. They use 40% much less energy than their predecessors whereas supplying you with 15% higher efficiency from the p-cores and a whopping 68% enchancment within the effectivity cores.
These processors use the identical x86 structure and are available in ten completely different variants. Whereas the corporate makes these claims, allow us to study the variations between Intel Lunar Lake and Snapdragon X-Elite when it comes to CPU efficiency, GPU efficiency, battery life, AI capabilities, and app compatibility.
Intel Lunar Lake vs Snapdragon X Elite CPU Comparision
Beginning with CPU Structure, Intel Lunar Lake processors have a brand new CPU design based mostly on the X86 structure. It makes use of an analogous hybrid structure that options 4 efficiency cores (P-cores) and 4 new effectivity cores (E-cores). Intel claims these Lunar Lake processors use 40% much less energy than their predecessor, Meteor Lake.
Whereas the efficiency core can provide 15% extra energy than the predecessors, effectivity is the most important cause for the effectivity claims within the newest Lunar Lake processors. The brand new Lunar Lake processors include Intel’s newest Thread Director, which manages duties between effectivity and efficiency cores.
In the course of the keynote, Intel claimed that the complete Microsoft Groups software can run solely on the effectivity cores, which improves battery. Intel additionally demonstrated media playback, which solely makes use of effectivity cores to attain efficiency effectivity intel claims.
Then again, Qualcomm’s X Elite Processors are available in Plus and Elite variants and use ARM structure with 12 Oryon cores, all of that are high-performance cores. In contrast to the hybrid structure of Intel’s newest Lunar Lake processors, X-Elite high-performance cores with all 12 cores dynamically modify energy based mostly on the duty. Qualcomm makes use of dynamic energy administration and activity scheduling with out separate effectivity cores to stability efficiency and energy constantly, which is clear in the actual lifetime of my testing.
Within the Geekbench scores, Intel Lunar provides robust single-core efficiency, and Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite leads in multi-core efficiency on account of 12 high-performance cores. Nevertheless, these numbers are solely benchmarks and should not replicate real-life efficiency. We’ll take a look at and showcase the real-world outcomes as soon as we get hands-on with these laptops.
Intel’s single-core efficiency might be higher fitted to on a regular basis duties corresponding to opening apps, loading net pages, and light-weight multitasking. Qualcomm X-Elite processors may also be good at multitasking, corresponding to video rendering, utilizing skilled apps like Photoshop (native ARM variations).
#Rating
|
Chip Title
|
Single-Core Rating
|
Multi-Core Rating
|
---|---|---|---|
2
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 258V (Lunar Lake)
|
2674
|
10743
|
3
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 268V (Lunar Lake)
|
2637
|
10430
|
1
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 238V
|
2617
|
10332
|
4
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 226V
|
2543
|
9881
|
5
|
Snapdragon X Elite – X1E80100
|
2369
|
13980
|
6
|
Snapdragon X1P-46-100
|
2360
|
12890
|
7
|
Snapdragon X Elite – X1E78100
|
2293
|
9117
|
Intel Lunar Lake vs Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite GPU
Intel has at all times been forward in GPU efficiency, and the most recent Lunar Lake processor makes use of its latest Intel’s Xe2 GPU structure, a sophisticated model of Intel’s Arc Xe2 structure.
Intel claims the GPU cores are 30% extra environment friendly than earlier variations. The corporate additionally claims Lunar Lake processors are 30% sooner than AMD and 68% sooner than Qualcomm, although these numbers nonetheless must be verified in real-world testing. One important acquire for Intel is ray-tracing assist throughout all Lunar Lake processors, a function absent in all Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processors.
AI comparability: X-Elite vs Lunar Lake
Whereas AI is one other main issue within the Qualcomm X Elite processors, Intel has topped it. In comparison with the 45 TOPS efficiency on X-Elite, Intel Lunar Lake processors can ship as much as 48 TOPS (Tera Operations Per Second).
Intel Lunar Lake has a bonus in AI efficiency on account of its mixture of the NPU and GPU. Intel says the mixture of CPU, GPU (Xe2), and NPU delivers over 100 TOPS of AI efficiency. Then again, Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite provides as much as 45 TOPS of AI efficiency utilizing solely its Hexagon NPU and lacks built-in AI acceleration in its GPU.
Intel additionally showcased benchmarks, which is once more their declare. We should take a look at the real-world outcomes to find out which is the perfect. Additionally, the Copilot assist for Intel Lunar Lake is coming this October, that means we might quickly see Microsoft Copilot PCs working on the Intel Lunar Lake processors.
App Compatibility: Intel Lunar Lake vs Snapdragon X-Elite
App compatibility is the most important situation for the most recent ARM computer systems. Nevertheless, this isn’t true with Intel’s x86 structure within the Lunar Lake processors. Most apps and video games are constructed for Intel’s X86 structure, and there’s no want for emulation, which is Intel’s greatest benefit. Most apps and video games can carry out considerably higher on Intel’s Lunar Lake than an emulator on Arm-powered laptops.
In my current overview of the Asus Vivobook S15 OLED, powered by a Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite processor, I discovered that it has wonderful battery life, sooner efficiency at decrease wattage, and good GPU efficiency. Nevertheless, one factor that involved me was the compatibility of the app. Though there’s a new Prism x86 emulation layer to run x86 and x64 purposes on ARM-based Snapdragon processors, they don’t provide the identical native efficiency because the native variations. Intel will reclaim its crown if it delivers all of the efficiency scores they’ve claimed.
Intel Lunar Lake Processor Variants
Processor Quantity
|
RAM (Reminiscence Velocity / Capability)
|
P-core (P-core rely / E-core rely, Max Turbo Frequency)
|
Constructed-in GPU
|
NPU AI TOPS
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core Extremely 9 288V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 32GB
|
4P / 4E, 5.1GHz
|
Intel Arc 140V GPU
|
48
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 268V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 32GB
|
4P / 4E, 5.0GHz
|
Intel Arc 140V GPU
|
48
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 266V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 5.0GHz
|
Intel Arc 140V GPU
|
48
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 258V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 32GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.8GHz
|
Intel Arc 140V GPU
|
47
|
Intel Core Extremely 7 256V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.8GHz
|
Intel Arc 140V GPU
|
47
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 238V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.7GHz
|
Intel Arc 130V GPU
|
40
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 236V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.7GHz
|
Intel Arc 130V GPU
|
40
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 228V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.5GHz
|
Intel Arc 130V GPU
|
40
|
Intel Core Extremely 5 226V
|
LPDDR5X 8533 MT/s / 16GB
|
4P / 4E, 4.5GHz
|
Intel Arc 130V GPU
|
40
|
Intel Lunar Lake or Qualcomm X Elite: What’s Finest for Your Laptop computer?
Primarily based on the present knowledge, Intel Lunar Lake can be a sport changer. Simply after I believed Qualcomm overtook Intel, Intel is again with essentially the most environment friendly processor designed for skinny and light-weight laptops. Later this 12 months, Intel is gearing as much as launch Intel Arrow Lake processors designed for highly effective desktop processing.
I’ve seen evaluations suggesting that Intel’s claims are legitimate. Concerning battery life, Intel Lunar Lake beats Apple and Snapdragon in real-world testing* (Watch the video above). I’ve watched movies suggesting Intel Lunar Lake provides dependable battery efficiency with higher efficiency in real-world testing. Primarily based on the present knowledge, right here is which one it is best to decide.
Class
|
Intel Lunar Lake
|
Qualcomm Snapdragon X Elite
|
---|---|---|
CPU Structure
|
Makes use of hybrid design with 4 Efficiency cores and 4 Effectivity cores (x86)
|
Makes use of 12 Excessive-performance Oryon cores (ARM-based)
|
CPU Efficiency
|
Sturdy in single-core efficiency. Barely behind in multi-core efficiency on account of fewer cores.
|
Leads in multi-core efficiency on account of 12 high-performance cores.
|
GPU
|
Xe2 GPU structure is extra highly effective and helps ray-tracing assist. 30% extra environment friendly and 68% sooner than Qualcomm in graphics duties (Claims)
|
Does not have assist for ray-tracing. Sturdy for each day duties however weaker in high-end graphical workloads in comparison with Intel.
|
AI Efficiency
|
48 TOPS of AI efficiency, barely forward in AI capabilities. Helps Microsoft Copilot.
|
45 TOPS of AI efficiency. Sturdy however barely behind Intel in uncooked AI capabilities.
|
Compatibility
|
Full x86 app compatibility. Runs all Home windows apps natively with out efficiency points.
|
Nonetheless, not many video games or apps are natively appropriate with ARM structure. Apps that run by means of emulation has efficiency points in my testing.
|