For over eight years, an elephant named Sonu has been held captive in Chhattisgarh as a part of the Forest Division’s technique to handle the rising human-elephant battle within the State. Sonu allegedly killed 5 individuals and injured one, in addition to inflicting harm to crops and homesteads in Achanakmar Tiger Reserve in 2015. The elephant was 12 then.
In captivity, Sonu has sustained extreme accidents from iron chains and ropes tied across the legs. Regardless of authorized interventions, the complaints of neglect and abuse persist. In August 2024, authorities have been as soon as once more alerted to the mistreatment of the elephant.
Sonu is presently held on the Elephant Rescue and Rehabilitation Centre, Pingla. This centre, which has beforehand attracted consideration for allegations of mistreatment of elephants, is supposed to shelter younger deserted elephants forward of their launch into the wild, in addition to present take care of older, sick, or captive elephants. It additionally serves as a refuge for elephants rescued from abuse, in addition to these with accidents, disabilities, or in want of court-mandated safety.
Additionally Learn | Chhattisgarh’s aggressive coal mining is destroying its crucial elephant corridors
On September 5, Sudhir Kumar Agrawal, Chief Wildlife Warden, Chhattisgarh, arrange an professional committee for a thought-about opinion on whether or not Sonu was match to be launched. The committee included specialists from the Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun; the Elephant Research Centre, School of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Thrissur, Kerala; Faculty of Wildlife Forensic and Well being, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh; Kanan Pendari Zoological Backyard, Bilaspur and Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Lorami, Chhattisgarh. Agrawal didn’t reply to telephone calls or messages from Frontline.
In 2016, Nitin Singhvi, a Raipur-based wildlife fanatic, filed a PIL petition for the discharge of an elephant chained on the Achanakmar Tiger Reserve, Bilaspur, by the Forest Division officers. Citing violation of the Part 11 of the Wildlife (Safety) Act, the petition maintained that the elephant shouldn’t be indefinitely stored in captivity, leading to its domestication, however be permitted to dwell within the wild.
In captivity, Sonu has sustained extreme accidents from iron chains and ropes tied across the legs.
| Photograph Credit score:
SATYA PRAKASH PANDEY
Singhvi mentioned: “After I first noticed the elephant, he couldn’t even sit comfortably. The legs have been severely wounded from fixed makes an attempt to interrupt free from the iron chains tightly certain to a tree. The injuries have been infested with worms, and pus was oozing from them. Ravenous and wracked with ache, the elephant had fallen right into a state of hysteria.” He added: “After I filed my PIL, the Animal Welfare Board of India despatched a group of specialists to evaluate and deal with the elephant. On two events, docs really helpful releasing the elephant into the forest to hitch a herd. Regardless of full restoration, the authorities didn’t set him free.”
Following intervention by the Animal Welfare Board of India and the State Wildlife Division, the Excessive Court docket issued a number of directives for Sonu’s medical examination, remedy, and rehabilitation. In its order on August 18, 2017, the court docket acknowledged that there had been clear neglect, notably with regard to remedy of Sonu’s accidents.
The order additionally said that Dr Rajeev TS, Assistant Professor and Undertaking Chief on the Elephant Research Centre, Kerala, had performed an inspection of the elephant on July 12, 2017. Veterinary specialists additionally really helpful releasing Sonu into his pure habitat. After assessing the elephant’s bodily and psychological well being, the senior veterinary coach Dr Rakesh Chittora really helpful following Worldwide Union for Conservation of Nature tips for the translocation course of and in search of the experience of the Wildlife Belief of India. Relocation is supported by the Wildlife Safety Act of 1972, which mandates the rehabilitation of captured wild animals to cut back their trauma.
Though the court docket prompt Sonu’s rehabilitation within the forest, it left the last word determination to the “knowledge” of the State Forest Division. A Excessive Court docket bench led by Chief Justice Thottathil B. Radhakrishnan and Justice S.Ok. Gupta praised the petitioner for highlighting Sonu’s plight, particularly the elephant couldn’t search authorized reduction by itself. Of their ruling, the judges cited Article 48A of the Structure, which mandates wildlife safety, and Article 51A(g), which urges residents to indicate compassion for all dwelling creatures.
Additionally Learn | Hills of Hassan district stricken by perennial human-animal battle
“It’s my most cherished want to see Sonu free from human management and dwell freely within the wild. He will be let out any time as an elephant by no means loses its pure instincts,” mentioned Singhvi, including: “There isn’t a proof on document that Sonu has killed any human being.”
Dismissing the Particular Go away Petition, the highest court docket in its order of February 2, 2018, famous: “Though we’re not inclined to intervene with the impugned order handed by the Excessive Court docket but we grant him (petitioner) the freedom to maneuver Excessive Court docket, after passage of a while, if committee doesn’t act in accordance with instructions issued by the Excessive Court docket.”
In August 2024, Folks for Animals (PFA) appealed to Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai to launch Sonu, stating that his extended captivity went in opposition to the nation’s dedication to animal welfare. PFA additionally requested that the elephant be launched on September 7, celebrated as Ganesh Chaturthi, the birthday of the elephant God.
