Minister Rijiju defended the Invoice, asserting that its provisions are designed to enhance the effectivity, transparency, and accountability of the Waqf Board. He emphasised that the amendments would profit Muslim girls, youngsters, and marginalized teams inside the group by making the Waqf Board extra inclusive.
Regardless of these reassurances, a number of opposition leaders demanded that the Invoice be despatched to a committee for thorough examination. The choice to refer the Invoice to a JPC displays the federal government’s acknowledgment of those considerations and its willingness to permit additional scrutiny.
Probably the most contentious facets of the Invoice is the supply that permits non-Muslims to be a part of the Central Waqf Council. Moreover, the Invoice proposes granting extra energy to district collectors and permitting appeals in opposition to the selections of the Waqf Tribunal. These modifications have been met with important criticism, significantly from those that view them as undermining the standard governance and autonomy of the Waqf Board.
The introduction of the Waqf (Modification) Invoice 2024 has thus turn out to be a flashpoint in Indian politics, with the opposition elevating considerations about its implications for the Muslim group and the Structure. The referral to the JPC means that the Invoice will bear additional scrutiny earlier than any last choice is made.
