5 Bold Changes in Waqf Regulation to Empower Women, Warns of ‘Dangerous Narrative

Shubham
2 Min Read

 

Government Denies Allegations of Waqf Land Usurpation, Focuses on Empowering Women and Children

New Delhi:

Recent allegations claiming that the government plans to seize Waqf land through changes in the Waqf laws are inaccurate, according to sources who spoke to NDTV. These claims follow remarks from the All India Muslim Personal Law Board, which suggested the amendments aim to empower Muslim women and children facing difficulties under current regulations.

Misconceptions and Concerns

Sources indicate that a misleading narrative is being spread by some clerics, who are making unfounded claims about land confiscation.

The All India Muslim Personal Law Board stated that any alterations to the Waqf Act “will not be tolerated.” Spokesman Dr. SQR Ilyas argued that the government intends to modify the status of Waqf properties through around 40 amendments, simplifying ownership.

Purpose of Waqf Properties

Dr. Ilyas highlighted that Waqf properties are charitable donations made by philanthropists for religious purposes. He emphasized the government’s role in regulating these assets through legislation.

He also warned that the issue might extend beyond the Muslim community, potentially impacting Sikh and Christian endowments.

Historical Context and Need for Change

The initial Waqf Act was established in 1954, with changes in 1995 and 2013. Now, many within the community, especially women, are questioning why current laws aren’t being updated.

Once land is designated as Waqf, it is irreversible. This has led to influential individuals taking control, leaving women and children without support. For example, divorced women often face difficulties securing rights for themselves and their children, sources mentioned.

Proposed Amendments

The proposed changes include two main components: the inclusion of women in the boards for the first time and verifying land before declaring it as Waqf property. Sources noted that a timeline for passing these changes has not been set.

 
 

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *