Hyderabad: The state authorities on Monday submitted earlier than the Telangana Excessive Court docket that the Hyderabad Inexperienced Pharma Metropolis can be continued and there’s no change within the earlier resolution concerning land acquisition for the undertaking.
Advocate-Basic A. Sudershan Reddy representing the federal government knowledgeable the courtroom that the undertaking initiated by the earlier BRS authorities via GO 31 was intact. He stated that the farmers and landowners, whose land had been but to be acquired, would get appropriate compensation.
Justice Ok. Lakshman of the Telangana Excessive Court docket was coping with a batch of writ pleas and contempt instances filed by farmers and landowners who had been affected by the proposed Pharma Metropolis. The petitioners from Medipally and Kurmida villages challenged the land acquisition proceedings and had been profitable in acquiring an order setting apart the acquisition awards and declarations.
With regard to the instances filed by the petitioners from Nanaknagar, the courtroom stayed the acquisition proceedings. Regardless of this, the income authorities weren’t coming into their land within the Dharani portal and never extending Rythu Bandhu advantages.
The Advocate-Basic assured the courtroom that the federal government would maintain negotiations with the farmers and they are going to be supplied honest and affordable compensation. The AG additionally knowledgeable the courtroom that the Rythu Bandhu will even be supplied without delay together with the compensation.
Petitioners’ counsel Ch. Ravi Kumar argued that Rythu Bandhu was meant for seasonal funding to farmers and criticised the federal government’s strategy of paying it at a later stage, within the absence of current award proceedings. He stated the petitioners had been struggling the results of unsuccessful land acquisition proceedings for seven years. It was introduced to note of the courtroom that sure petitioners had been receiving Rythu Bandhu help after submitting contempt instances.
The courtroom directed the petitioners to make representations to the authorities for availing advantages inside per week and directed the authorities to contemplate the identical inside two weeks thereafter. The decide directed the federal government to submit an affidavit detailing the negotiations carried out with the villagers and the efforts taken to resolve the problem.
A division bench of the Telangana Excessive Court docket, comprising Justice Sujoy Paul and Justice Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, on Monday heard a petition difficult the amended norms prescribed for reservation for bodily challenged individuals and roster factors within the notification for Group-1 posts, issued by Telangana Public Service Fee.
The petitioners additionally challenged GO 29 , which didn’t apply the rule of reservation in respect of every class of reserved candidates independently within the 1:50 ratio (50 occasions) to the primary written examination of Group-1 companies.
To look at the influence of amendments to the foundations and to allow senior counsel for the petitioners to supply the amended guidelines ,the courtroom adjourned the listening to to September 25.
Telangana HC reserves order in bail software filed by Yadati Sunil Yadav
The Telangana Excessive Court docket on Monday reserved for orders within the bail software filed by Yadati Sunil Yadav, second accused within the homicide case of YSRC former MP Y.S. Vivekananda Reddy.
T.L. Nayan Kumar, representing Sunil Yadav, submitted that the accused was in jail since 2021 whereas many of the others had obtained bail. He identified {that a} poor individual like Yadav was incarcerated and that actual conspirators and beneficiaries of the homicide — Kadapa MP Y.S. Avinash Reddy, his father Y.S. Bhaskar Reddy and Siva Shankar Reddy —had been let out.
Anil Tanwar for the CBI and counsel S. Goutham representing Dr Nareddy Suneetha, daughter of Vivekananda Reddy, sought dismissal of the plea on the bottom that there are not any change of circumstances after the dismissal of his earlier bail software on Might 3, 2024. It was additionally identified that there was direct proof within the type of eye witness accounts supporting the case in opposition to Yadav.
Goutham highlighted the necessity for steadiness between particular person rights and the honest and clear administration of justice. He stated the Manish Sisodia judgment can’t be utilized in a routine method particularly when the character of crime is heinous, the accusations are extreme and the severity of punishment is as much as life sentence.
